User:Tnguyen01/Transient expression/Cafe1919 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tnguyen01


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Article

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The user's version of the lead is much more concise. The content is neutral, relevant, and concise. The article has a clear structure, balanced coverage, and reliable sources. The lead mentions a section on methodology, but the article does not go over it. You may want to add a methodology section in the body or remove the second paragraph from the lead.

Also, you should cite your source for the section on Chinese hamster ovary.

Overall, great work!