User:Tnmaddie/The Arcade Restaurant/HabeshaKid Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tnmaddie


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tnmaddie/The Arcade Restaurant


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:Tnmaddie/The Arcade Restaurant

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead section is very well written and effectively provides an overview of the topic. The information in the lead is written about throughout the article. It is concise and easily understandable.

Content
The content of this article is very relevant to the topic of this article. The content is up-to-date. The content also does a great job of shortening the content gap in Wikipedia because it is a brand new article that has not been on Wikipedia before.

Tone and Balance
Overall, the tone of the article is neutral and for the most part it is well balanced. However, there are places where some of the language used has a biased tone to it. For example, at one point during the article, the word "delicious" is used to describe a certain dish made by the Arcade Restaurant. Although this food may be delicious, it is used to create a biased tone.

Sources and References
Although there are external links at the end of the article. None of the information includes citations in the article. All of the statements made in the article are not cited from outside sources. Citations should be added.

Organization
The article is well organized with helpful sub-headings. The article is also very well-written. As a reader, the content is easy to read and follow. I did not notice any grammatical errors.

Images and Media
The one image displayed in this article is laid out well and well-captioned.

For New Articles Only
The article provides good information, but the information is not cited. So, I cannot see which sources were used and I cannot tell if this article passes the "notability" requirements because I do not know which sources were used. Citations should be added.

Overall Impressions
This article was well-written and easy to read and follow. This article has also done a great job of reducing the Wikipedia content gap by providing information about a location in Memphis that has not been presented on Wikipedia before. The lead section was brief and informative. The main ways to improve this article is to make the language used in this article more neutral, to cite the sources, and to create a references list.