User:Tnmanning/Petroleum/Konniehatz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

I am reviewing the article Petrolium, written by Tnmanning


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tnmanning/Petroleum?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Petroleum

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead for this article is somewhat clear. The author of this edited article included the original sections in order to help the reader understand.

Content

The content which was added helps the reader understand some of the terms and processes which the original article was attempting to explain.

Tone and Balance

The tome of the content which was added is neutral and goes into detail without overwhelming the reader.

Sources and References

The sources found within the edited sections of this article were both relevant and compelling. There was a solid mix of both trusted sources and research journals.

Organization

The content is hard to follow along since it is only certain parts of the article which were chosen to be edited. The author failed to provide the location within the original article on where they were pulling parts of the article from.

Images and Media

The article does not include any images or media. Perhaps including an image could help explain certain concepts.

Overall Impression

Overall, the content adds an improved understanding of the overall subject. It would be my suggestion that the author includes where the original text was pulled from in order for a better understanding of what is being explained.