User:Tntle/Greenwashing/Gingerbmichigan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Tntle


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tntle/Greenwashing


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Greenwashing

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content - The content is informational, up-to-date, and helps to fill the content gap. The addition of a Thailand section is a great way to add to this article, because you can integrate it pretty easily and there is otherwise no mention of Southeast Asia.

Possible things you can add

"Due to the competitive advantage of green hotels in the Thai market" - How much of an advantage is this? Do people really care about how green their hotel is?

Is "Green Leaf Certification" effective in its purpose? Are the hotels held accountable or is there corruption in this system?

What does it take to be a "five leaf hotel" versus a "one leaf hotel"?

Tone and Balance - You do a good job of staying neutral and offering factual unbiased information. I don't think you really have much of a problem with this.

Sources and References - I'll just reiterate Professor Phung's point here that you should be careful citing the same source too many times. If you are able to use a different source for the same information that is probably better. However, the sources you are already using look trustworthy and good for this paper.

Overall- The content definitely improves the article as a whole and it fits pretty well in the article. The only other thing I would recommend is that you add a sentence or two of transition that tie the two paragraphs together and back to the topic as a whole.

Just so you know I also was able to use a couple of your sources in my paper so that was really helpful too!