User:Toady03/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Chemistry

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I like learning about chemistry and find the topic interesting and diverse. This topic has been a central part of my life in recent years due to my growing interest in the discipline.

Evaluate the article
Lead section: Lead section is concise. It explains what chemistry is, it's applications, and history.

Content: Content is good since it covers a myriad of aspects related to chemistry. Very broad which is good for such a general term. It even covers subdisciplines in chemistry. Content up to date and relevant, links work.

Tone and Balance: Neutral tone, objective. Clearly only stating facts and not trying to persuade the reader towards one opinion.

Sources and References: Lots of sources. References from varying authors mostly reliable, some are a bit older and from more suspicious looking websites, though often backed up by another more relevant source.

Organization and Quality of Writing: Highly organized, clear subsections and easy to read. No typos.

Images and Media: Very useful images and media that support their paragraphs. Well captioned and explain what it's depicting such that a novice and understand.

Talk Page Discussion: Not too many conversations happening

Overall Impressions: Status: Level-2 vital article. This article has a very diverse set of subtopics that clearly state the different aspects of chemistry. It could be improved by adding more images/media about the redox and equilibrium subchapters. The article is well developed.