User:Tofu98/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
William Grant Still

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was chosen by my professor.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

The Still article's lead section included an overview of the composer's life, as well as useful links to relevant topics. The modest length suits readers looking for a simple overview.

Content

The article's content is plenty relevant to the topic.

Tone and Balance

Tone appears professional and representative of Still's life upon first read through.

Sources and References

Source links appear to function. Sources trend on the more recent side, with some older sources being included.

Organization and writing quality

The organization of the article flows well, and content gets more specific as the article progresses.

Images and media

Images present serve article. Specific images, particularly regarding the career section might help illustrate Still's life better.

Talk page discussion

Talk page has several entries, one particularly inflammatory prompt seemed to want to remove any mention of Still's race in the article. The other entries seem to be more straightforward book keeping.

Overall impressions

This appears to be healthy, with all of the corresponding elements in tact and in good shape.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)