User:Tombrady1283/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Talk:Bernard Andrieu)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(I chose the article after following links from the title "Philosophy of Sport". I followed this thread due to my interest in sports. The article outlines sports philosopher Bernard Andrieu, and highlights some of his work.)

Evaluate the article
(Upon examination of the article, the lead section is short, but effective. However, the lead section lacks any mention of Andrea's education. The content is up to date, but is very concise.The tone of the article is hard to interpret, as it is extremely short.The sources used are credible, but it would be beneficial to include information from more sources. The article is written with acceptable grammar. The talk page was successfully used to discuss an edit by a user, and serves as a good example of how a talk page should be used. In conclusion, the article provides valuable information, but would be more effective if it gave more insight on Andrea's life and education, as well as descriptions of listed work. )