User:Tommyj0127/GIS and aquatic science/Goobglorp Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tommyj0127


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tommyj0127/GIS and aquatic science


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * GIS and aquatic science

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead
 * Are you adding a section to the GIS and Aquatic Science article?
 * If so, a title should be included with your section
 * The beginning of your draft has a great lead
 * You briefly detail the importance of using GIS frameworks, making it very understandable what this article is going to discuss
 * Content
 * All of the content is totally relevant to the subject of the article
 * Tone and Balance
 * The tone is neutral and unbiased
 * Sources and References
 * There are eight references
 * This is good, but the assignment called for a minimum of twelve sources
 * Perhaps a few more can be found to further support the statements provided
 * The references should also have their own section
 * The majority of the references provided do an awesome job at supporting the statements they cite for
 * Reference # 6 is for a paper that mainly focuses on the lack of nutrients rather than the overloading of them
 * Another paper may be more suitable for the statement that this paper has been cited for
 * It may also be beneficial to link Wikipedia articles to certain terminology in the article
 * To Wikipedia pages such as the one for “GIS”, “watershed”, “algal blooms”, etc.
 * Organization
 * The subject matter in the article also flows really well
 * However, the grammatical errors do make some sentences harder to understand, as they may need to be read a couple of times to grasp them correctly
 * Grammar is a little off, especially regarding punctuation
 * I recommend copying and pasting your draft into a Word document and utilizing the corrections it provides – that should be a huge help!
 * Images and Media
 * No images have been included, but one or two may be nice to have in the article for some “pretty fluff” 😊
 * This isn’t necessary, however
 * Overall
 * This is a great draft with several references that make it very informative
 * What to improve:
 * Grammatical errors
 * More references
 * Great start and awesome job!

Goobglorp (talk) 02:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)