User:Tommyoconnor16/Jackie savitz/Celeste320 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tommyoconnor16


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tommyoconnor16/Jackie_savitz/Bibliography?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_bibliography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead could use a stronger introductory sentence that describes the articles topic. It includes a brief description of the articles major sections. All of the content on the page was relevant to the topic. The content had a good amount of sources along with it. Everything seemed to be coming from a neutral point of view. I liked the chart of the published books. For the most part the sources came from a diverse amount of places. Maybe in the second bullet point in the bibliography say Savitz instead of Ms. Savitz. Overall, very good article with a nice picture too.