User:Tonesalv03/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:1926 American Football League season

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
It was one of the c class articles in the options.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead has an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the topic. It gives a brief description of the major sections, doesn't include information that's not present in the article, and is concise.

The content is is relevant to the topic and is up to date. There is no missing content and the article doesn't deal with historically underrepresented populations or topics.

The article is neutral, there is no bias, no over/under representation, no minority viewpoints, and there is no persuasion intended in the article.

All of the facts are backed up by reliable sources, the sources are thorough, the topic is is in the past so the sources aren't too current, and there are sources written by different authors. A couple of the links don't work.

The article is well written for what the topic is, I couldn't find any spelling/grammatical errors, and it is well organized.

There are no images.

The talk section is just about links that were changed. It is rated a C and a part of wikiprojects. It is different because it isn't really discussion about changing content, but just changing the links.The article is well for what the topic is. It provides important information on the topic and I can't see any improvements except the links being able to work. The article is well developed.