User:Toniesledz/Espresso/ADeng102 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Lead is up to date reflects artice well and is concise includes introductory sentence before summarizing articles main parts
 * Content is relevant gives more insight to the history/origins of espresso and fills content gaps from original article without spreading persuasive information
 * Article is well organized easy to read and to understand and delivered in a neutral tone
 * refernces are cited at the end of a paragraph rather than throughout there is repeated citations when information came from the same source no huge blocks of text