User:Toniesledz/Espresso/K Wilson12 Peer Review

General info
Toniesledz
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * Link to the draft you're reviewing:User:Toniesledz/Espresso
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Espresso

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)