User:Tony Sidaway/Wheel war arbcom summary

Based on this summary compiled by Johnleemk for the Arbitrators.


 * 01:37, 5 February
 * creates template Template:User pedophile with the wording "This user identifies as a pedophile."
 * 04:25, 5 February
 * speedy deletes Template:User pedophile as "unnecessarily inflammatory"
 * 04:54, 5 February
 * restores Template:User pedophile
 * 05:51, 5 February
 * adds Template:User pedophile to his userpage
 * 05:57, 5 February
 * MarkSweep lists Template:User pedophile for deletion at Templates_for_deletion/Log/2006_February_5
 * 14:28, 5 February
 * blocks indefinitely with the summary "user identifies himself as a pedophile". Makes no further sysop actions
 * 14:28, 5 February
 * Carbonite says on the deletion discussion: "Just for the record, I plan on indefinitely blocking anyone who uses this template. If someone wants to announce their disgusting tendency to have sexual thoughts about children, so be it. You're not welcome here though. I'd also block anyone identifying themselves as a rapist or murderer. The only user to currently include this template is User:Joeyramoney. He's now been blocked."
 * 14:31, 5 February
 * Carbonite announces on User talk:Joeyramoney "I've blocked you indefinitely for the inclusion of Template:User pedophile
 * 14:39, 5 February
 * Carbonite announces this on Administrators' noticeboard in a new section headed "Blocking self-identified pedophiles" : "The userbox Template:User pedophile is a great way of identifying those users who consider themselves to be pedophiles. I plan on indefinitely blocking any user who includes this template. I've already blocked the only user to include this template, User:Joeyramoney. Wikipedia has no obligation to permit deviants to edit. If a someone has sexual thoughts about children, keep it to yourself and stay off Wikipedia. I can't even imagine the PR nightmare that the Wikimedia Foundation would face if articles were being written by self-identified pedophiles."
 * 15:39, 5 February 2006
 * deletes Template:User pedophile with summary "no"
 * 15:48
 * unblocks Joeyramoney witht he summary "having a template claiming to be a pedophile on a user page is no grounds for blocking; see WP:ANI"
 * 17:16, 5 February
 * Ashibaka restores Template:User pedophile
 * 17:16, 5 February
 * Joeyramoney replies to Carbonite on his talk page: "I wanted to be a pedophile
 * 17:23 5 February
 * Joeyramoney elaborates: if you have a box for pedos, do you honestly think anyone's goig to use it seriously? i'm sure half the people it linked to were teenagers."
 * 17:36, 5 February
 * Ashibaka replies on User talk:Joeyramoney: "Actually, you're the first person to use it, and some sysops were rather upset about that for no apparent reason. Don't worry about it, though, it's being debated on the discussion board and in the meantime you can start editing right away."
 * 17:36, 5 February
 * Joeyramoney replies to Ashibaka: "oh, wow, i'm actually rather proud of myself."
 * 18:13, 5 February
 * deletes Template:User pedophile with summary "I agree - no"
 * 19:35, 5 February
 * recreates Template:User pedophile as blank
 * 19:36, 5 February
 * David Gerard protects the blank Template:User pedophile with the summary: "attack template, protected blank"
 * 21:03, 5 February
 * Paroxysm creates Template:User paedophile with the same wording, with the edit summary "sidestep admin abuse)"
 * 21:37, 5 February
 * Violetriga deletes Template:User paedophile with the summary "del"
 * 22:41, 5 February
 * blocks and  indefinitely with the summary "Hate speech; inciting attacks against other contributers"
 * blocks indefinitely with the summary  "Hate speech; inciting attacks against other contributers; abuse of admin powers"
 * 21:45, 5 February
 * Carbonite announces on his userpage that he is leaving the project. "'ve lost interest in editing here. Too much arguing over things that should really be common sense. Good luck to all."
 * 22:51, 5 February
 * unblocks El C with the summary "No consensus to ban"
 * 22:51, 5 February
 * unblocks Carbonite with the summary "No consensus to ban"
 * 22:56, 5 February
 * El C blocks Carnildo for 24 hours with the summary "WP:POINT"
 * 22:58, 5 February
 * The_Land unblocks Carnildo with the summary "Do not block users you are in dispute with"
 * 22:58, 5 February
 * Ashibaka restores Template:User paedophile
 * 22:59, 5 February 2006
 * Ashibaka restores Template:User pedophile
 * 23:00, 5 February
 * The_Land unblocks Giano with the summary "No consensus to ban"
 * 23:01, 5 February
 * David Gerard deletes Template:User paedophile with the summary "attempt to sidestep deletion of "
 * 23:02, 5 February
 * David Gerard creates a blank Template:User paedophile
 * 23:02, 5 February
 * Ashibaka restores the history of Template:User paedophile
 * 23:03, 5 February
 * David Gerard protects the blank Template:User paedophile with the summary "Protected blank"
 * 23:04, 5 February
 * Ashibaka unprotects Template:User paedophile with the summary "protected for no reason"
 * 23:07, 5 February
 * Ashibaka unprotects Template:User pedophile with the summary "this template does not attack anyone"
 * 23:09, 5 February
 * recreates Template:User paedohile with the edit summary "Restore pending close of TfD"
 * 23:16, 5 February
 * deletes Template:User paedophile with the summary "as per consensus at TfD"
 * 23:17, 5 February
 * BorgHunter restores Template:User paedophile
 * 23:32, 5 February
 * Ashibaka recreates Template:User pedophile with the edit summary "restoring and adding tfd"
 * 23:32, 5 February
 * Ashibaka edits Template:User paedophile with the edit summary "adding tfd"
 * 23:37, 5 February
 * MarkSweep deletes Template:User pedophile with summary "duplicate of Template:User pedophile"
 * 23:41, 5 February
 * El C blocks "El C (contribs)" for 15 minutes with the summary "I want this on the log. My block was for speaking out against pedophiles. That was the so-called "hate-speech" (according to Carnildo, pedophilia and homosexuality are interchangable - which I argue is utter, utter nonesense)"
 * 23:42, 5 February
 * Jimbo Wales deletes Template:User paedophile with the summary "I'm sorry but just, no. I'm sure there's a CSD rule or three which covers this, but I honestly don't care. Just, no."
 * 23:59, 5 February
 * David Gerard protects Template:User pedophile with the summary "deleted by Jimbo; recreated blank and protected to discourage recreation"
 * 23:59, 5 February
 * David Gerard protects Template:User paedophile with the summary "deleted by Jimbo; recreated blank and protected to discourage recreation"
 * 01:04, 6 February
 * Jimbo flips the sysop bit of
 * 04:26, 6 February
 * Jimbo Wales blocks Joeyramoney for 1 week with the summary "blatant trolling "
 * 05:05, 6 February
 * Karmafist unblocks Joeyramoney with the summary "AGF, only thing done was vote in a deletion debate"
 * 05:38, 6 February
 * Jimbo flips the sysop bit of
 * 06:15, 6 February
 * Jimbo flips the sysop bit of, and
 * 05:40, 6 February
 * Jimbo Wales blocks "Joeyramoney (contribs)" for 1 week with the summary "I desysopped karmafist for reverting my block -- no more wheel warring"
 * 05:40, 6 February
 * blocks Joeyramoney for 1 week with the summary "(A) He was doing nothing but trolling B)Two other users, including Jimbo blocked him C)It is poor form to wheel war without discussion"
 * 07:46, 6 February
 * El_C announces in an edit summary on his talk page that "I'm gone, indefinitely"
 * El_C announces in an edit summary on his talk page that "I'm gone, indefinitely"