User:ToriTrouble/Russian architecture/Norgusbjorgus Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ToriTrouble


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ToriTrouble/Russian_architecture?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Russian architecture

Lead
You don't have a lead included in your draft, which leads me to believe you intend to use the one in the original. This should be mostly fine, as you are mostly expanding upon the sections originally in the article, but there is still some information you could incorporate.

Content
Your content is all relevant and on topic. However, your sources are somewhat outdated. I would look for more recent ones.

Tone and Balance
Your tone is fairly neutral, and I have few complaints. You have some fairly loaded words, like "brutally" in regards to Stalin's destruction of the Church of St. Nicholas, but aside from that you never try and argue a point or try to persuade the reader of anything, which is good.

Sources and References
The biggest issue with your additions is a very small pool of sources and a complete lack of citations. I do not think you have a single one. It is important that you fix that immediately, because Wikipedia could take your entire draft down if you do not.

As I said before, your sources could certainly be more current, and your authors more diverse. Bring in more sources to fix that, as you need more anyway.

Organization
Your writing is mostly good, but you do have some grammatical errors that need fixing spliced throughout the article. Your capitalisation could also use some work. For example, the words Byzantine and Greek usually need capitalizations ("with predominant churches built in brick and stone with byzantine style art forms, initially built by imported greek and byzantine masters but soon learned and slightly modified by the locals.")

The overall organization is good. You break the time periods down well, as well as the various influences.

Images and Media
You have no images or media. Considering you are adding a lot of information, you should find and incorporate some.

Overall Impressions
While your additions do a lot of good supplying the Russian architecture article with a great deal more detail, it is very rough. You are in desparate need of citations, and your grammar could use a lot of work. However, the content you added is very good, and the additions have potential to be really great.