User:Torr2256/40S ribosomal protein S16/CRM2000 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Torr2256)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 40S ribosomal protein S16 - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * 40S ribosomal protein S16 - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is more complete but there is no obvious evidence that they have edited the article like anything in the sandbox or on the bibliography page. There is a good list of sources that are reliable in the article. There are probably more available sources out there that discuss this topic. The sources are all relevant and are by a variety of sources and the content is all relevant and up to date.This content can be improved by adding more to the article overall but also by making it more accessible to the public by explaining it in a more understandable way other than scientific words that only people in the scientific community can understand. ￼