User:TorresM16/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Wikipedia:WikiProject Autism - Wikipedia) I will be evaluating WikiProject Autism.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article because I know the basics of Autism, but I have never read about Autism fully in depth which to me is important sense I have a two-year-old I am very awake about his development and the little things that he does that to me might seem strange. The first impression that this article gave me was that it was a short article it was easy to read and there was many links to other articles that go in a complete detail, and images that grabbed my attention to read more in detail.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article of Autism has a introduction section but does not go in to detail of what the reading will be about. They do on the other hand talk about the goals they have for this specific article, and the scope. Content wise there is a lot of images and just one sentences that provide hyperlinks to the articles that they got the information from. In the article there is a section that provides all of the articles that were used for this project. The article is mainly filled with charts and images with hyperlinks to other articles that have in more depth the aspect of Autism. My overall impression on this article would be that for being my first time evaluating and reading a wikipedia article it was easy to follow through, but at times difficult to understand and I had to use the hyperlinks to read in a fuller detail what they were trying to get through.