User:ToryTaylor99/National responses to the UN plastics initiative/Juliamarriott Peer Review

Bias to the UN National agreement, "influential. Make sure to include the citations to paraphrased facts. Great overview, could use more details on the guidelines and principles of the act. Mention more details on the national plans and legislation, what does it mean? Seems up to date and has three sources to back up the research! Make sure to include subheadings and headings focused on national reactions and information about how different countries responded to the changes. Photos with captions could also be helpful. Dividing the country's different forms of legislation was a smart way to categorize and provide an overview of the agreement.

Strengths:

- Organization

- List of sources

- Accuracy

Weaknesses:

- More details about the responses

- Cite paraphrased pieces of information by linking it to your sources

- Subheadings about the conclusion and the future impact this act will have

General info
User:ToryTaylor99/National responses to the UN plastics initiative
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ToryTaylor99/National_responses_to_the_UN_plastics_initiative
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article provides a comprehensive examination of various countries' efforts in addressing plastic pollution. The lead introduces the topic and outlines the major sections of the article. The content is relevant and up-to-date, covering legislative frameworks, implementation strategies, and impact assessments across different nations. It addresses the equity gap by discussing initiatives aimed at mitigating plastic pollution's disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. The tone is neutral, and sources are appropriately cited, though there may be room for improvement in diversifying the authorship of the sources. The organization is clear, with well-written content and effective section divisions. The inclusion of images could enhance the article's visual appeal and understanding.

Strengths: - concise and clear introduction in the lead - relevant and up-to-date content covering legislative, implementation, and impact aspects - neutral tone and well-organized structure - comprehensive use of sources to support claims

Areas of Improvement: - consider diversifying the authorship of sources to include historically marginalized individuals where possible - enhance visual appeal by incorporating relevant images with appropriate captions - ensure all links are functional and adhere to Wikipedia's regulations - double-check for grammatical and spelling errors to improve overall readability