User:ToshibaCK6R4/sandbox

Working on a theory of everything (ToE)

EHR=MAMA, is essentially the hypothesis that links electron holes with antimatter. In the above case the behaviour of an electron hole is not only similar but identical, in that annihilation of an electron and a positron generates radiation at 511keV

If indeed electron holes are actually behaving like positrons in that they move slower in a lattice behaving as if they have more effective mass than electrons then the basic physics could be similar and merely a matter of scale. This has been explored in 1948 by Dr. Feynman who suggested that antimatter could be seen as normal matter moving backwards through time and by extension antimatter may not be identical to matter which would match up with cosmological observations and potentially prove why younger galaxies are fractalized and far more complex than older galaxies due to pair production from super-massive black holes and paired neutron stars in addition to explaining the origin of fast radio bursts, gamma-ray bursts and blitzars. The weaker interaction of antimatter would also preclude the generation of anti-stars and in fact this has also been observed.

The interesting feature here is that if the well known physics of semiconductors can be applied to the less well known physics of gravity then a hypothesis could be constructed to use the base equations to predict how antimatter should behave in a gravitational field. When the data is later obtained from LHC it may be found that the hypothesis is correct or incorrect.

There are many arguments against antimatter having antigravity but an argument exists that there is a threshold value (-2.993%) above which the Universe would tear itself apart well before the current era due to runaway expansion and spreading out of matter below the limit for stars to self sustain. This also supersedes dark energy as an explanation for the missing mass in the Universe. As the LHC has not yet managed to generate enough neutral cold antimatter to test the gravitational interaction (7500%) the electromagnetic fields still overwhelm any attempt to measure this factor.

Also relevant is that Cooper pairs could also be modeled as quasi-particles and provide a way to unify the behavior of LTSC and HTSC materials without invalidating the BCS theory. In addition to providing a theoretical framework to explain the upper limit of 218K for H3S and other documented effects, this also suggests a way to screen materials for superconductor potential as in the case of cuprates it appears that a critical electron density needs to be achieved for the Cooper pairs to form without which nothing happens, in this case oxygen saturation is the key.

If indeed metallic hydrogen represents the highest possible electron density for matter then this sets the maximum possible Tc to be 250.72K in normal matter and any transient effects seen higher than this threshold are not stable without active methods such as continuous electron feeding from an external device as also documented by Prof. Prins and others. This may have been noticed by Prof. Silvera but unfortunately no further tests can be done as the only meta-stable sample was lost in a routine laser test although evidence of a weak Meissner effect was seen on a magnetometer sweep during the original cooling phase prior to later LN2 immersion.