User:Totent/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Chimelong Paradise
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: This article requires a lot more information, and some contents are incorrect.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, to some extent.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise, but can be furthur improved.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * No
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * A lot more can be added to this page.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * No. Some sources are outdated.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, they do.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * No. Grammar needs to be improved, and contents need to be easier to read.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Yes
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * No

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * I am not sure
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes. The images are listed in table view

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are not many topics on the talk page. There is one topic related to Chimelong Paradise's past edit, and it was done in 2016.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * The article Chimelong Paradise is rated as Stub-Class, meaning that it requires more information. It is part of WikiProject China.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The topic is about external links to the article rather than the article's content.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * The article needs more content.
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * The article includes many images that are eye-cathing, and the images are formatted nicely.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * Grammar, consistency of date format, and spelling can be improved. Up-to-date information should also be added.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is underdeveloped.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: Talk:Chimelong Paradise