User:Tprice98115/Negrophilia/Juliewagoner12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tprice98115


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tprice98115/Negrophilia?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Negrophilia

Evaluate the drafted changes
There are currently no changes made to the article or sandbox draft of the user who I am assigned to peer review. That being said, all of the suggestions I will make below are based on the starting state of the article at this moment.

The first thing that jumps out at me is the sheer lack of information in the article; it is currently very short. Additionally, I think that more terms could be linked to their respective wikipedia pages in order for readers to easily learn more context about the article's content (ex "avant-garde" at the end of the second paragraph). It also seems like a good amount of the information included in the article needs to be cited, and you could research this information in order to find articles or websites making claims about it and then input the citations. The bottom three references also look as if they are not properly cited, and need to be input to the wikipedia ref table. There also is not much media included in the article (just the one photo of Josephine Baker) and likely wikipedia has more media available for free use related to the topic that could enhance the article. The only sub-section included in the article is on the Bal Negre, so potentially in your research of Negrophilia you could focus on additional aspects of the subject to add as sub-sections to the article (maybe Negrophilia in popular culture or media?). I also noticed that the talk page of the article will likely not be of help, as no one has contributed to it since 2017. However, the latest comment makes a good point: information about African-American artists migrating to France post-WW2 like we have been learning about in class would be a great sub-section to add to the article. The article overall does seem neutrally-balanced, but the list of sources could be much more exhaustive.