User:Traci.alexander/Article Evaluation

Hippology - (study of the horse)

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in this article is relevant and their is no distractions.

Is any information out of date? Information is not out of date.

Is anything missing that could be added?What else could be improve? More information could be added to the article along with citations.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is neutral.

Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? The viewpoints are represented respectively, but the form of the article is poor.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? This article has no citations provided.

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? The sources provided only incorporate a title and an author. The facts in this article are referenced unclear. The sources are neutral.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There is no discussions on the talk page for this article.

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article is part of the Wikiproject Equine. It has been rated a stub-class and of low-importance.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There has been no discussion in the talk page.