User:Trevorburnes/Mitochondrial ribosome/Bmaghen Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Trevorburnes


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Mitochondrial ribosome


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mitochondrial ribosome

Evaluate the drafted changes
Added section of comparison to other ribosomes:

Did well to introduce the comparison by describing their evolutionary routes.

Then you well set up two separate important aspects: configuration and function.

Your description of the additional subunits might benefit from some detailed description about the additional proteins, how they fit differently in the overall configuration and maybe connect them to how they might affect the overall function.

Also it seems like there is too much use of a single source for this section.

Nice table, it seems like a good way to organize this type of information.

Rest of Article:

It seems like this is still a work in progress. A suggestion sections to add is maybe studies that isolate these types of ribosomes.

It also seems like the function section could be further developed. There seems to be a bit of an imbalance where structure is covered much more than function in the article.

Finally the lead section seems pretty good and concise. I think it could probably introduce the other sections more.

When you do add more stuff, try to use some more sources too.