User:Treyj96/Sport psychology/Ccurry24 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Treyj96


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Treyj96/Sport psychology - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Sport psychology - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead has not been changed yet because the content has not changed significantly. But it does include a concise, brief paragraph on what is in the article. I feel like it could be expanded by mentioning the education used for the psychology, aka educational and clinical sport psychology. In the content aspect, you have done a good job of taking out many outdated or unnecessary parts of the article, while adding to the grammatical correctness of the article. I did see you added some up-to-date info, but I feel you could expand on recent studies. You did good on the neutrality and balance of your added contributions as well. The one reference added is up-to-date and the links work. As I mentioned about grammar, you did a good job providing conciseness and organization to the article. In the whole article there is only one picture, so I would try adding a few more to have illustrations.

Overall, I feel you did a good job cleaning it up, but there was not much added data yet. I feel as if you added some images and maybe a few articles mixed in, it would improve the article (mainly focusing on updating outdated articles.