User:Tribe of Tiger/New Notes

NIGEL BONNER
Mentions already present on WP:


 * Jacqueline Mitton A Visitor's Introduction to the Antarctic and its Environment (1984), with Nigel Bonner


 * List of South Georgians redlinked name, Nigel Bonner


 * Rothera Research Station section, Bonner lab "The lab was named after W. Nigel Bonner, head of biological science at BAS between 1953 and 1986, and deputy director of BAS from 1986 to 1988."


 * Antarctic krill *


 * Gerald Bonner "Nigel became a zoologist, and headed the Life Sciences Division of the British Antarctic Survey from 1974 to 1988."

Book sources:
 * Wiley Library


 * World Cat

"Obituary": Nigel Bonner Need access to Cambridge (library source) for full article. Ask Buidhe &/or LouisAragon per "Cambridge" access

"Obituary": Nigel Bonner

Richard John Harrison


 * World Cat better.

Festschrift
rough notes.. In honor of his retirement in xxxx, from CUA, his coll. produced XXX, a series of essays, published as " book name" a Festschrift. Notes number of coll. and wikilink any who have articles, here on WP.

Literary works
Gerald Bonner's primary focus as a writer and Early Church historian was centred on Augustine of Hippo. As noted, his early interest, sparked at the age of thirteen, was to become a life-long intellectual devotion.

Over the years he acquired a knowlege of Augustine and the Patistric era, as well as an understanding of Bede and Cuthbert in the context of the times in which they produced their written works. Through his scholarship, he was able to highlight the "religious depths" of the three saints, as opposed to a mere historical analysis.

Festschridt book: https://books.google.com/books?id=GNiFAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=1974+Sunderland+Conference+on+Bede&source=bl&ots=XSQWNTGYny&sig=ACfU3U35bFvRDRAKFCuzdkYXix2jTnoZMg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjB8_2RzYLrAhWkdN8KHUvVDNgQ6AEwFHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=1974%20Sunderland%20Conference%20on%20Bede&f=false

On WP, our task is to report and summarize what reliable sources tell us. However, we cannot copypaste their words into WP. This means that we must read and understand the source, in order to paraphrase and rewrite in our own words. I am not sure if I am reading religious thought, theology or Early Church history, and I am over my head, trying to summarize what I do not understand! This is why it is preferable to have an editor who is familiar with the subject matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1070#Sourcing_and_citations JBA letter to Teahouse.

Could I not[note] here that the information on my blog now has a creative commons license so making use of my father's obituary should no longer be a violation of copyright. Edit summary note by JBA 9:23 25 July 2020

jeremy.bonner@durham.ac.uk.

return to england in 1994, concentration on Pelagian Controversy

Times leters
An editoral in The Times entitled "A Bishop's Beliefs", outlined the concerns with David Jenkins' public pronoucements. On the same page appeared a letter from Gerald Bonner.

In a rebuttal to Bonner's letter, a reply was posted on 6 June 1984:

"Mr. Gerald Bonner feels that he has the right to expect in his bishop the same acceptance of fundamental Christian belief that he has himself and seems to base this right on his generosity in relieving the poverty of the clergy."

"I would not disparage Mr. Bonner’s well advertised liberality, but would remind him that the Church of England is supported by a wide variety of other people. If he rattles his purse whenever his bishop offends him, he will deserve the hireling he seems to expect." Graham Shaw, Chaplain, Exeter College

David Jenkins: ''He caused more outrage a month later when he said there was absolutely no certainty in the New Testament about anything of importance. Widespread doubts were expressed about the wisdom of making him a bishop, and a petition with more than 12,000 signatures was delivered to the Archbishop of York.

Copied from GB
There was a concern that Jenkins, as bishop-designate, was still speaking in his role as an academic theologian, and that he had not given proper and responsible consideration to the possibility that his words might be construed as authoritative doctrine.

In a 26 May 1984 letter to The Times, Bonner wrote:

Civil liberties
In the United Kingdom, persons watching or recording live television are required to hold a television licence. "Enquiry agents" or inspectors, are allowed to investigate possible unlicensed viewing in a dwelling. However, the occupant is well within his/her rights to deny answering any questions (remain silent) and is under no obligation to allow entry into the property. If denied entry by the home's occupants, the agents obtain a search warrant, in order to enter.

As noted in his 15 January 1990 letter to "The Times", Gerald Bonner did not own a television. For several years, he had maintained his legal right to refuse to answer inspector's questions. He stated: "Suspicion had been engendered by the fact that I had refused, over a period of several years, to answer inspectors' enquiries, since I did not see why I should have to deny possessing what I did not possess and did not want, when I was not legally compelled to do so."

On 12 January 1990, two license inspectors, along with two police officers, arrived to search his home. The warrant that they produced was "inadequatedly dated", as it did not state the year, and furthermore, was only valid for one month. Bonner stated: "It would appear that those who enforce law and order do not apply their principles to their own affairs."

In the letter, he said that "most disturbing aspect of the affair", in his opinion was that: "in Britain at the end of the 20th century, not to own a television receiver automatically makes an individual an object of suspicion and subject to investigation."

Bonner stated that he was most disturbed by the fact that "not [owning] a television receiver automatically makes an individual an object of suspicion and subject to investigation."


 * "[It] is clear that, in Britain at the end of the 20th century, not to own a television receiver automatically makes an individual an object of suspicion and subject to investigation. This I find the most disturbing aspect of the affair."

The Times of 22 January 1990 (issue 63609) p.13.

A favour
At some point you added a ref to your uncle, Nigel Bonner. It seems to me that both of the "fine sons" of Constance Bonner are of interest to readers. I have checked with another editor, who has confirmed my estimation that "Nigel Bonner" is "notable", by WP standards. I have gathered sources, and for the first time in my 4.5 years, would like to write an article.

However, I cannot gain access to one particular source, and I hope that you might be able to assist me. Here is the internet link, etc,:.

This seems to link to an old-fashioned print-type obituary, and I would, of course, cite it properly. But I would prefer to access it without having to pay US$25. Frankly, it is not so much the US$, as it is the fact that internet security issues (re:payment) make me nervous, because I don't understand them.

Let me know if you can assist me. You now have my WP email address, used for the other scanned article.

Best wishes and appreciation, as always,

Nigel Bonner
Draft:Nigel Bonner

I will contact WP:RX, thanks! Then I shall immerse myself into the mysterious process of Article Creation, or do you think I should create directly in Mainspace?

I have "four years" of experience with formatting articles by adding/editing sections, same for working with citations/references. I have copyedited and have experience with article expansion. I know how to use Earwig, to check my paraphrasing work. (I do not, however, have experience with adding catagories.) Suggestions or advice?

Antivenom sources
Snake antivenom is complicated for manufacturers to produce. When weighed against profitability (especially for sale in poorer regions), the result is that many snake antivenoms, world-wide, are very expensive. Availablility, from region to region, also varies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aOlNiRC3jI antivenom, Youtube.

https://cen.acs.org/biological-chemistry/biotechnology/search-better-antivenoms-heats-snakebites/97/i4 another source The search for better antivenoms heats up as snakebites get renewed attention, C&EN, Biotechnology. Dinsa Sachen. Jan 28, 2019. Vol 97 Issue 4

https://www.who.int/bloodproducts/AntivenomGLrevWHO_TRS_1004_web_Annex_5.pdf

On June 9th, 2017 WHO categorized snakebite envenomation into the Category A of the Neglected Tropical Diseases. This new situation will allow access to new funding, paving the way for wider and deeper researches. It should also expand the accessibility of antivenoms. Let us hope that it also leads to cooperation among stakeholders, aiming at improving the management of snakebites in developing countries

GOOD SOURCE Snakebite envenoming

REWORD ABOVE In 2017, WHO categorized snakebite envenomation as a Neglected Tropical Disease (Category A). They wish to encourage research, expand accessibility of antivenoms, and improve snakebite management in "developing countries".

weird article

coral snake antivenom refs:

copied from Coral snake article:

The existing American coral snake antivenom stock technically expired in 2008, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has extended the expiration date every year through to at least 30th April 2017. Foreign pharmaceutical manufacturers have produced other coral snake antivenoms, but the costs of licensing them in the United States have stalled availability (see above). In 2013, Pfizer was reportedly working on a new batch of antivenom but had not announced when it would become available. , the Venom Immunochemistry, Pharmacology and Emergency Response (VIPER) institute of the University of Arizona College of Medicine was enrolling participants in a clinical trial of INA2013, a "novel antivenom," according to the Florida Poison Information Center. Copy stops here

In Australia, a single dose is available, without prescription, and costs AU$20; for those with a prescription, five doses can bought for AU$40, amounting to a rate of eight dollars per dose.

From Sandbox 4
Snake antivenom is difficult for pharmeceutical companies to produce, and when weighed against profitability (especially for sale in poorer regions), the result is that many snake antivenoms, wotld-wide, are very expensive. Availablility, from region to region, also varies.

Wired, good source

More possible sources, from Antivenom TP: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/snakebites-about-to-get-more-deadly Snake Antivenom

[https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Who_Wrote_That%3F Who Wrote That? - MediaWiki] who wrote that, alt to wikiblame

aylesford

CCI ELISA ROLLE


TP history