User:TrickyArmyMan/sandbox

"There is No Third Possibility" (Wald, George, "Innovation and Biology," Scientific American, Vol. 199, Sept. 1958, p. 100)

The belief of Darwin's theory is far from complete. There are many missing links and other facts that counter the statements made by Darwinist. The easiest and strongest piece of evidence that argues against Darwin's theory was discovered just three years after Charles Darwin published his book On the Origin of Species, in 1859. That piece of evidence is spontaneous generation. Darwin's theory is centered around the fact that at one point in time, life came out of nothing and more came out of that life, and so forth. Through Louis Pasteur's experiment, and through that of others, science has taken another dramatic turn to face the fact that there must be a divine Creator.

In 1862, French chemist and microbiologist Louis Pasteur, conducted the famous experiment that is now known as the process of pasteurization. Pasteur's experiment was conducted to determine whether or not bacteria spontaneously generated in food. His outcome was that food went bad and became infected by the germs in the air. If said food were cut off from the surrounding air, then the food will not become infected nor go bad. Pasteur's discovery directly contradicts Darwin's theory that life arose out of nothing. Which being said, "he consciously voided discussing the origin of life" (Peretó, Juli, Jeffrey Bada, and Antonio Lazcano. "Charles Darwin and the Origin of Life.") in his book The Origin of Species knowing that life cannot appear out of nothing. So, there must be a divine Creator.

Even if there was no Creator, and life spontaneously generated, how could something so advanced as the flagellum come to be? In the terms of natural selection, it would make sense for the bacteria to preserve the working system, as it does provide the cell a functional advantage, but "the problem is not explaining why natural selection would preserve the motor and propeller system once it had been built. The problem is explaining how natural selection could build such a complex system in the first place." (Explore Evolution, p. 117) Just like the engine in a car, every part has its purpose; if a single piston or bolt were missing, the entire system would not work. A complete motor with 10 moving parts and 40 parts for circuitry and structure, simply cannot all show up in the same place at the same time in the correct working order. Natural selection will only preserve that that provides the organism a superior advantage. "...All 30 parts have to be present together...," (Explore Evolution p. 118) so why would the cell preserve dead weight? Therefore, there must have been a divine Designer and Creator, to create something so advanced.