User:Trinarojas1/Street harassment/Foxypolymath Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? User: Trinarojas1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Street harassment

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The Lead has not been edited by my peer yet. Due to this fact, I am going to evaluate the article as it currently is written. The first sentence of the Lead gives a clear picture of what street harassment is, but I feel this sentence could be shortened or otherwise split into two sentences for increased clarity. The Lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections which should be added. I found this Lead to be overly detailed. For example, it includes information regarding cultural interpretations of street harassment, and views on photojournalism and street photography otherwise not explained in other sections of the article. These details should either be removed, additional sections should be added into the article, or this information should be integrated into other sections aside from the Lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
The content that has been added to this topic so far is relevant and generally up-to-date. Many of the sources appear to be from the last five to ten years which is excellent. I do feel there is a content gap when it comes to providing information regarding the prevalence of street harassment globally. The article clearly focuses with a greater depth on street harassment in the United States and also specifically the experience minorities have in America with street harassment. A more global focus on the prevalence of street harassment would be ideal, and also the section on street harassment in Egypt could be expanded.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The content that has been added is neutral in tone. However, it appears that there is a content bias towards focusing on United States based street harassment as opposed to this topic from a more global viewpoint. Viewpoints that are over represented include American and Eurocentric facts and information on street harassment and its prevalence. The experiences in Africa, Asia, and South-America could be sited more often and described in greater detail. I do not feel the content persuades the reader in any way since it remains neutral in tone, but I think the article would be improved if it was more globally focused.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
No new content has been added by this user yet, but all of the current content appears to be backed by reliable secondary sources. There is a mix of secondary sources being cited including journal publications and news articles. I do feel the sources are thorough and current. I checked a few links and they all worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
No new content has been added to this article, so I cannot comment on this.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
My peer did not add any images or media yet, but the article does include one image that is relevant to the topic. This image is well-captioned and includes a proper citation. I feel another image or two could be added to this article to help break up text and further improve the visual layout of the page.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

New Article Evaluation
N/A this is not a new article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Since no content has been added to this article yet by this user I cannot comment on whether the article has been improved or not by any changes. Nonetheless, I think that making the Lead paragraph more clear and concise would be a relatively easy way to improve this article, and additional information could be added regarding street harassment in African, Asian, and South American countries to provide a more global perspective. Also, a couple more relevant images that are well-captioned would make this article more visually appealing.