User:Trinityt516/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Thermoproteus

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
There are no pictures for Thermoproteus. The phylogeny is very bare. All of the scientific journals used are prior to 2016. The significance & description is very brief and can include a little more information.

Evaluate the article
The lead does a good job at being concise and briefly explaining what the scientific article is going to be about. The content is not up to date which has a slight effect on the accuracy of the article. There are no images, which makes it hard to picture what Thermoproteus looks like or its structures. On the talk page, they talk about how the article is lacking necessary pictures. The article does not include any bias. The scientific journals seem to be outdated, since they are all prior to 2016. The article properly describes Thermoproteus and its functions; however, many specifics and visuals are missing.