User:Trisandejarnatt/Freedom of religion/Leon2008cheng Peer Review

It’s good to maintain uniformity. You have mentioned the access date as "Accessed 1 Oct. 2023" for all citations, which is great for consistency. If possible and relevant, include the affiliations of the authors at the time the works were published. In the second citation, ensure that editor names are listed correctly. It's unusual to have two editors with the last name "Michael". If "Michael" is a middle name for one of the editors, it should be initialized. These are all my opinions. I don't know if they're helpful or not. Hope you will find it useful.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)