User:Tristenadams3821/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cell nucleus

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose this article because it is involved in every aspect of our life and without the cell nucleus we would not be here writing or reading this today.

Evaluate the article
The opening sentence is good though I wish it had more of friendly opening as this is a topic that could be come very wordy and complicated. Although the lead doesn't include any information not discusses in the article it is a little wordy for me as an introduction and the whole understanding of a nucleus is not needed as it will be explained in detail in the following sections.

The content is accurate and up to date the content was very informing and hit all the boxes for this section.

I do not believe there was any biased and the author was able to leave his personal points of view out of the article and only conveyed the information as it should be to be purely to inform the reader in an organized manner.

Must facts but not all were backed by sources. The sources ranged from being quite old to also being within only a year and a half old so I believe a good range of sources was used and they were accurately sited in the writing as well.

I believe the article became a bit wordy in some of the sections as I don't believe this page was intended to teach a grad student the cell nucleus and maybe didn't need the level of detail that some of the sections offered. But it was organized in an easier and informative way. I really enjoyed the pictures and graphs as they did pertain to the information and helped to visualize the information that was written in text. and they were sited so that they did not break wikipedias copyright rules.

There is a couple conversation in the talk page with both pointed to the lengthy and over detailed discussion that I had pointed out too. the page is rated as a c and the page doesnt explain it in a way that a biologist would per say in the wya the information is laid out but in essence the material is the same.

The articles strengths are definitely detail and organization while its shortcoming is its introduction. The article is well developed as it gives clear accurate and precise information for a reader interested in the Cell Nucleus