User:Trnichb/Communication ethics/LostNelpaso Peer Review

Making the tone neutral
Communication ethics refers to how individuals utilize language, media, and journalism to establish relationships based on their morals and values. It entails being cognizant of the repercussions of one's actions and valuing the perspectives of others while fostering transparency and fairness. James Chesebro defines communication ethics as ethical standards that align with a broader, humanistic understanding of humanity, aiming for the growth and enhanced opportunities for individuals. The concept of communication ethics can vary depending on different worldviews, with each perspective framing communication through its unique codes, procedures, and standards.

Scholars utilize various ethical theories that encompass all forms of communicative interactions. Ethics come into play in every human interaction, whether it's overt or subtle, leading to both intentional and unintentional ethical quandaries in daily life. Different branches of communication, such as rhetoric, media studies, intercultural/international communication, and relational and organizational communication, are inherently intertwined with ethical considerations. Communication ethics is characterized by three fundamental factors: heterogeneity, interconnectivity, and historicity. The primary issues within communication ethics are integrity, power, and alterity, and the article briefly touches upon five different types of ethical reasoning.

General info
(LostNelpaso)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Communication ethics:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)