User:Trodriguez30/ArticleEvaluation

Most things mentioned in the article is relevant to the topic; however, there is more discussion regarding the history of the Wilson Cycle and how it differs from the supercontinent formation process than what the Wilson cycle actually is. A small portion that was distracting was the one example that was presented, the Atlantic Ocean. This is the only example of research done on the topic in the whole article, and there is no citation that directly refers to it. There is not much information about the Wilson Cycle itself; as a result, a point of improvement for the article is to go more in depth with the actual processes that happen in the Wilson Cycle. Although there are links that direct readers to words that are not colloquially known, it does not catch all of the jargon that is difficult to understand.

The tone of the article is primarily neutral. However, there are certain words like "iconic", "broadly", and "rarely". There needs to be more information about the Wilson cycle and not purely focus on the Atlantic Ocean.

Many of the citations have working links, come from good and unbiased sources, and are not biased when I read through the citations. However, there is one citation that has no link and another where I cannot review more than half of the first page of it.

There is not much conversation going on in the talk page of the Wilson Cycle. The current topic is what can be added to the article and how it can be improved. It is a part of WikiProject Geology. Someone wants to discuss the relationship between mantle convection and the Wilson Cycle.