User:Trojan2023/Digital footprint/Jcklimper Peer Review

The lead is an explanation of the topic. This is good, but might already be in your article. It is good that you added the opening about parents. I do find that the content is relevant to the topic but you are missing sources so I'm not sure if it is you opinion or knowledge. You did a good job talking about kids being violated and their digital footprint being created by their parents without their consent. The only thing I see regarding that is that some of the text you used comes of as possible opinion. There were a couple of grammatical errors. Instead of saying "Sometimes when a parent is posting their child picture," you could say child's instead. Overall, it is good but the sources need to be input to backup the validity of what you are saying.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)