User:Trojan2023/Digital footprint/Lenabean2023 Peer Review

Lead
The lead has been followed regarding the content assigned. There is a perfect introductory sentence. However, aside from a small overview of the explanation of digital footprint, not much else has been added.

Because digital footprint as a whole does not singularly apply to children, the author may consider leading with a more general statement and bridging into the effects on children in the content. The lead does include information not provided in the article.

Content

Specifically regarding the children portion, the content the author is adding is new and relevant information. Because the author has not posted their references, I can not determine if it is up to date. However, the statements made are not based on clinical observations, and are more of a general synapsis. The author does need to finish adding more detail and further expanding on this topic.

Tone & Balance
The content added is neutral. It does not take a particular side, with the exception of the bias of parents compromising children's digital footprints. The tone of the article is definitely swaying towards parents potentially being problematic towards the start of their children's digital footprints. The author may consider approaching the topic from a more neutral stance. With the tone the author is setting, the reader may be swayed to view parent's posts regarding their children more critically.

Sources & References
There are no sources or references added yet.

Organization
So far, the author has written very concisely and the information is very easy to read. However, sections have not been added yet.

Images & Media
There have not been any images or media added yet.

Overall Impressions
I believe the author is on the right path to creating a great addition to the digital footprint page. I believe once the author adds more content, steers the reader in a more non-biased view, and adds their references, that they will do an excellent job adding content to this page.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)