User:Trtwe34/Taccola/AMCWiki1591 Peer Review

General info
Trtwe34
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Trtwe34/Taccola - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Taccola - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Really nice overall. All of your additions match the general flow of the article that was already present, and the information you added is relevant and does a great job of elaborating on what the article had already mentioned. I have a few nitpicks that might help your contributions further match the articles flow or improve the grammar.

Life and Career paragraph: Since this paragraph already includes a lot of dates noting significant points of his life, you could maybe provide the year Taccola got married or the time period he worked on Duomo? I read through one of the sources you cited for that information and it brought up at least approximate dates for both of those events, so you could add that in if it feels like it matches the rest of the section.

Work and Style paragraph: It might be worth going into more detail on his work in the waterworks system, especially if it was advanced for its time. That bit of info may not fit into the paragraph you mentioned it in, but it may be worth its own paragraph depending on how much you can find and how significant you think it is. If you wanna keep it to a sentence or 2, probably just mention it somewhere in the next paragraph.

Influence and Rediscovery Paragraph: This is great, just have a couple minor comments. The "furthermore" in the first sentence you added feels unneeded in my opinion, as that sentence works completely fine in the context without it. Toward the end of your last sentence, you add a quotation mark at the beginning of "Guilds of Judges and Notaries" but never added a second quotation mark to close off the quote. All of the content here is fine though, and even what I mentioned here is honestly pretty nitpicky.