User:Trystian13/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nurse anesthetist

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because my career goal is in the medical field which is why I chose nurse anesthetist. This subject matters because the demand for CRNAs is high and is becoming an increasingly popular career similar to physician assistants, as both are master level degrees in the medical world that can practice without the supervision of a medical professional.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The introductory sentence is clear and concise, describing the topic well. The sources are good, with a few that are just .com and .org sources which aren't the most reliable. Lead paragraph does not talk about the sub heading. Information might be a little outdated as it references, at the latest, 1960s. Article maintains a neutral and unbiased point of view. Article is tunnel vision as it only talks about CRNAs in the United States and nowhere else. Article is extremely underdeveloped, with little less than half a page worth of writing. Articles include no images which can be inserted.