User:Trystian13/Nurse anesthetist/Kelliecarblue Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Trystian13


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Trystian13/Nurse anesthetist
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nurse anesthetist

Lead
The lead does a great job about introducing the topic, but the first sentence in only about the United States. I think it might be a good idea to open the article with something more broad and about CRNAs all over the world not just in the US.

Content
Mentions something that happened in 2001 and that is more recent than 1936, but has anything happen more recently. The sentence that goes "The name, "Certified"" could be a new paragraph.

Tone and Balance
The article is neutral and shows no bias in the writing.

Sources and References
Sources are good but there is a red error line after the first.

Organization
The headings are good but since the it is called history and education the one paragraph could be separated into 2.

Images and Media
N/A

Overall
Think this is a good start. The few things that I think could be added are more recent laws and ruling (if there are some) and the introduction paragraph should be more broad and not just about CRNAs in the US.