User:Tson21/Nilometer/Madrugada11 Peer Review

General info
Tson21
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Tson21/Nilometer
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nilometer

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead Section
- The lead section looks great! I think that you'll be fine not making many edits to it. I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic, and the lead accurately sums up the information later mentioned in the article.

Clarity of Article Structure
- The article is well-organized, and the information about nilometers is ordered well in the different sections. I think that the photos you are planning to add are very relevant to the article's topic and will work well within the article.

Coverage Balance
- The length of sections correspond well to their importance, and I think that all the sections in the article are necessary to the topic. There isn't anything obvious left out of from the article. There aren't any conclusions drawn to try to change the mind of the reader, it all reads as very neutral.

Content Neutrality
- The content provided in this draft is very neutral, there is only factual information. There are no biases added into the content. There are not any sentences that make false claims or negative word associations within the information.