User:Tson21/Nilometer/Piesu123 Peer Review

General info
Tson21
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Tson21/Nilometer
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nilometer

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead section article adequately reflects the most important information of the article and evenly emphasized the different sections of the article. However, much of the lead as well as most of the article itself seems to have been unchanged aside from the addition of two sentences and two planned pictures, so there is not much to be added to increase the clarity of the lead. Perhaps some fixes in grammar and sentence structure could make the lead a bit less choppy and awkward to read.

The structure of the article is simple and is organized in a simple and readable way.

The article's content seems to be spread evenly across the different points of the topic and does not overemphasize any particular section. It also does not attempt to sway the reader toward any one particular point of view about the topic. The tone and overall content of the article also keeps a neutral stance that does not betray any of the personal feelings of the author.

Unfortunately, in the sandbox draft page there seems to be a complete lack of references to any sources for any of the points made in the article. Due to this, I cannot say whether the statements of the article accurately reflect the sources they were drawn from, whether they are reliable or not, nor if the group of sources used more heavily presented a singular point of view of the topic.