User:Tuh20608/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Pitcher Plant Talk:Pitcher plant

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I find pitcher plants, and many carnivorous plants to be quite interesting. More often than not people go out and buy carnivorous plants without knowing too much about them. Looking through the article itself, it just seemed that there were many personal opinions and questions being asked, which I was confused by.

Evaluate the article

 * It isn't quite fact-based or neutral, it instead seems like a blog or forum.


 * It seems to be coming from personal experience with growing a pitcher plant and not from peer reviewed sources.
 * Headings are in question form and are followed by authors thoughts and opinions for personal plant.
 * The images are also from the authors personal plant, which may not follow guidelines for posting images.
 * The talk page discussions are civil, they try to explain to the author that wikipedia isn't a blog and that there are different articles that the original author could look at to seek the answers to each question being proposed.
 * Sources given seem to have been checked or removed by others in the talk page due to copyright.
 * The writing itself is very short and simple. There is no summary of the topic, no lead, headings are used to ask a general question and then written out the reasoning as to why the question was asked.