User:Tuh42016/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cardano (blockchain platform)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am passionate about blockchain technology. I think this article could use some improvements and therefor I thought it would be a good candidate.

Evaluate the article
The Lead Section is well made in every capacity.

The Content section is one of the major area's that I believe requires work. It is missing some important recent information (how many people currently use the blockchain, some notable development projects taking place, future roadmap), and feels like it just isn't fully up to date.

The article is definitely neutral and I think properly represents all viewpoints.

There are a ton of sources, I simply cannot go through and check if these sources are representing all minorities and ethnicities from an author point of view. A lot of the sources are current and relevant, and seem to be from reliable publications. The links do work.

The writing is clear and without grammatical errors. It is also well organized.

The article has no images.

The talk page is full of discourse and drama related to deleted sections of this article. The article is rated with an E lock. This article is discussed from a neutral point of view, which is how it's supposed to be abd how we discussed this in class.

The articles strengths are that it's conciseness, its ability to make a complex topic simple and to the point, and its lack of bias.

The articles weakness is that it is missing some vital information that is pretty relevant, such as the numbers of development projects going on, some important partnerships and how many people currently use the blockchain.

I think the article is underdeveloped.