User:Tuliptooley/Colorado tick fever/Ksoccer22 Peer Review

Lead


 * The lead gave new content that I had not known about Colorado Tick Fever prior to this assignment.
 * The article lists very clear details about Colorado Tick Fever.
 * All of the facts in the article were cited.
 * This is an entire epidemiology section to my understanding and I like how it jumps right in with facts and does not give irrelevant information that would be covered somewhere else in the article.
 * This article has really good information and is written clearly and consicely.

Content


 * It is relevant to the topic because all of the information is Epidemiology, and it gave a clear definition of the distribution and determinents of this disease in the United States, and this data seems up to date, but it would be good to keep checking since such specific values of disease were given.
 * I think this relates to the equit gap because it is such a rare disease- good job!

Tone and Balance


 * There is a very nuetral tone that is 100% fact based and not opinionated
 * There are no opinions, just facts.
 * No viewpoints seem overstated, but maybe overall it is an understated article because it is so short.
 * It is not persausive and does a really good job conveying facts.

Sources and References


 * All of the sources work and seem credible, and nothing is plagerized.
 * The sources are from 2010, 2018, and 2019. The article says there are only 10 cases, but has thatt gone up since this was published?
 * All the links work and sources seem credible.

Organization


 * Written very clearly. I would put the age groups up sooner because it is an awkward last sentence to just throw into the paper.
 * Grammar and spelling looked good.


 * There are two sections on risk factors and secualt trends that are blank and need to have information in them in order to complete the epidemiology section for Colorado Tick Fever. I think the sections make it easier to look at.

Images and Media


 * There are no images or media, ad they are not necessary, but they may be helpful in just providing more information because this article is lacking.

Overall Impressions


 * The information that is currently there is good, but are some gaps in the article that still need to be filled in because not enough words have been added and two sub-sections have not even been started. Good start, needs more to be a complete article draft.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) tuliptooley


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tuliptooley/Colorado_tick_fever?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)