User:Tunjesh/Cybersecurity Capacity Maturity Model for Nations/MyMU797 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tunjesh


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tunjesh/Cybersecurity_Capacity_Maturity_Model_for_Nations?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

The lead captures the topic very well to the understanding of the reader. There are a few grammatical edits required.

Content

The overview sets the tone for the article and listing the various dimensions of the framework. It also captures the differences and changes in versions. The layout needs improvement as it is not clear whether some of the text's words are headers.

The author laid out a very well-thought-out tabular representation of the differences. Though not completed, the author has laid out other sections as well.

Tone and Balance

Based on the write-up so far, the tone appears neutral and well-balanced.

Sources and References

With the work completed so far, the author has provided adequate references.

Organization

The article is well organized. I am looking forward to seeing the final product and look.

Overall Impressions

The article is new and well thought out. The author has considered vital points to include. Even though not complete, I look forward to seeing this developed very well with concise and up-to-date information for the reader.