User:Turtlegeek/Forest dieback/Mantifa12345 Peer Review

Lead

- added new relavent information to the lead to indicate the information they added in the rest of the page

- overall consise and edited for grammarical errors.

Content

- in history "A lot (need to add "of") research"

- added significant information to the hypothesis section

- Can Etiology be linked to?

- information added explains more possiblities on how forest dieback can occur, rounds out the article well

- information added is cited well and is in a neutral tone

- Added information on consequences of forest dieback and climate change which provided more information to this page and explores further the complexity of forest dieback.

- Organization of new information added is clear and easy to follow, very few grammarical errors noted.

Sources and References:

- all new information added included relavant sources

- Sources included were recent and up to date publications

- Could not access reference 11, 12, 14 directly

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)