User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology/JasmineBriggins Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Twalton1996)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reverse psychology - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
I would recommend defining the meaning of reverse psychology such as the original article did but, from your own understanding of what reverse psychology means I am assuming that you plan on doing this because the top says editing. If you consider including the definition of reverse psychology in the article's lead I believe this will make your draft flow more logically, the content that you're currently drafting seems to be concise and relevant to the topic, As I read through your article, I noticed there are sentences that you have crossed out so you've acknowledged what needs to be removed to make your article better. I think adding references to your draft will also help your article flow in a logical order. Your article only seems to need small improvements which you've mapped out what you plan to do you just have to start constructing it.

Thanks JasmineBriggins. I won't be adding the definition of reverse psychology because the definition is already in the article lead. That was a great suggestion though. I will be adding references. Since doing this assignment, I have found a few different references and I plan on adding them soon. Thanks for the suggestions.