User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology/Kbaird17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Twalton


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reverse psychology - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
Hey Twalton! Here's my peer review for you,


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? You have a lead you just need to now combine what you have on reverse psychology on teenager and dating


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes, it does you are addressing that parent tend to use reverse on teenager when they are in relationships.


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Indeed, it simple to read; I think returning and reading out loud will assist with getting any contentions/mistakes as well.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Yes it's broken down into sections/general headings and then with specific details. If you want to change the order of the whole article, I would make sure that it flow right because you don't want to have reader confused when reading. For example start off with the history of reverse psychology and then who came up with reverse psychology, etc.

Overall, you have a good start to. Just keep in mind that you want your article to flow correctly when reading it, and not having reader lost in what they are reading.