User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology/Smalls2023 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Twalton1996


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Twalton1996/Reverse psychology - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Reverse psychology - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
So far, it seems like you have a great idea of how you want to improve your article. Don’t forget to add reference links to your work. This will provide easier access to the reference rather than having to scroll through the article to locate it. After reviewing the article, I feel that the lead section could use more information. This will help grab the reader’s attention and provide more data on the topic chosen. The “Among Children” section is also in need of more information and references, but I believe you mentioned that you are adding more to that. I like how you chose to change the title for that section. I find it more fitting. I also feel that the “”In dating” section could use more information to help build a better idea along with the “Paradoxical marketing” section. The last section I noticed that needed more data was the “Criticism of application” section. I agree that the “In media” part of the article does not contain enough information for the article. I like how you have changed up the table of contents to make the article read more fluently. Overall, I feel that you have a great start and idea for your article.

Hi Smalls2023, thanks for the suggestions. I plan on adding references this upcoming week. I have been doing research on reverse psychology among children, so I definitely will be adding more information about that as well. I think it would be great idea to add more information in dating section to help improve. Thanks for the suggestions. I will be taking your advice on adding the references and adding more information/data in that section. This really helped. Thank you!