User:TwoBeansInACan/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Alligator snapping turtle

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I am interested in the alligator snapping turtle. It's important to document any information for any animal as it provides us more information and can learn what they do. My impression of the article was that it had a good amount of information on it already.

Evaluate the article
The lead is clear on what the topic is and includes a table of contents that shows the major topics being talked about.

The content of the article is relevant and fairly up to date. Something that could potentially be added would be the history of the snapping turtle (ex: when the first one was founded).

The tone and balance of everything is neutral. Nothing is worded in a way that tries to persuade the reader.

The information is backed up by lots of sources, giving it credibility. I clicked a few links and they all worked.

The organization of the article makes sense and flows well. It's broken down into major parts using sub headings.

The images are well-captioned and enhance the reader's understanding of the information.

Overall, the article looks like it is full of information related to the topic. It seems well organized and the information is backed with sources. The tone is neutrally written and doesn't try to persuade anyone a certain way. One thing I would suggest that could be potentially added would be the history of the snapping turtle.