User:Ty.olkkola/Betula populifolia/MillyA1116 Peer Review

General info
Ty.olkkola
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ty.olkkola/Betula populifolia - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Betula populifolia - Wikipedia

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - No. The Lead is the same as the original article.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes. The Lead is concise and covers all the main points of the gray birch.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - No. The Lead is the same.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? - The Lead is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes, the content is relevant and adds information that was not present in the original article.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes. Most of the content came from sources that were published after 2000.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - No. Everything flows well.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? - No.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? - Yes, the content is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No. All content is neutral.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No. All content is distributed fairly evenly.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) - Yes. All content summarizes the information from the sources.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - Yes. The sources are thorough.
 * Are the sources current? - Yes. Most sources are from after 2000.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? - No.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) - While other sources are available, the sources that were used covers content sufficiently.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? - Yes.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - The content is clear and easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - Grammatical errors are minimal.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - The content is better organized than the original article, it is sorted into more sections, and the content is spread more evenly in each section.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images included.
 * Are images well-captioned? - There are no images.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - There are no images.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? There are no images.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - The content is more detailed that the original article and it is much better organized.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? - The content offers much more information that the original article.
 * How can the content added be improved? - Some of the sentences need references.