User:Tyingmyshiu/Umami/JBonz Peer Review

General info


 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
 * Tyingmyshiu
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Umami

Lead

Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No, not really
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Lead evaluation

Very good lead, precise and to the point. Gets the article idea right out

Content

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes and Yes

Content evaluation

Very informative up to date content! Never hurts to add more!

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Relevant to the topic
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Neither
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, content specifcally talks about the topic

Tone and balance evaluation

There is no bias in the paper which is good. Keep it all neutral and focused on the topic as such

Sources and References

Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes and yes when possible
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes they do

Sources and references evaluation

Multiple sources which is good shows your have supporting evidence to the topic

Organization

Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * yes very well written and quite organized
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors
 * Only slight grammar and spelling errors
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Although slight grammatical and spelling errors it was very well organized and straught to the point

Organization evaluation

Organization is key to helping the reader understand your points throughout the paper. Ensure that when your'e writing you allow informational sentence to add fluidity

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes they are
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes they do
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes

Images and media evaluation

Images are good, not too many is also good so continue that.

New Article Evaluation

Not a new article

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * Very informative and adds more depth to the topic which allows the reader to better be understood
 * How can the content added be improved?
 * Everything can always use improvement but there were only certain parts that lacked a little detail, Content page 6 Taste receptors could use a little bit of better understanding on how the receptors react to one another

Overall evaluation

Very good paper, needs some information in certain places but overall very good!