User:Tykora/Article Critique

= Article Critique = I visited the Titanium gold page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: its sources for the pop culture section are unreliable or nonexistent, the entire pop culture section is irrelevant to the article and is based on inaccurate information, and some of the examples of what titanium gold is used for has no cited evidence of actual use for those examples content.

Citation
There are three sources for the pop culture section of the article none of which are reliable, one is a personal summary of the iron man game storyline on a gaming website, another is a movie review by a critique in the Los Angeles Times that has no relevancy to the titanium gold at all, and the last link does not even work.

Structure/Completeness
The entire pop culture section is irrelevant to a chemistry based article and would be better served to mention titanium gold in an iron man article rather than vice versa if it applied but it doesn't the section says that iron man's armor is titanium gold giving a statement by Robert Downey Jr. as evidence, But what Robert Downey Jr. said was that the suit fit him like a gold titanium glove, not that it fit like a titanium gold glove the difference being gold colored titanium rather than titanium gold alloyed which means the entire section of pop culture had no real relation to titanium gold.

Grammar/Voice
Both the dental and jewelry examples of what titanium gold is used for have no actual proof that they are actually used for either of those examples only that they have been developed for dental and jewelry application. There is a inconsistency between the writing styles as some sentences us the Oxford comma and others use the Harvard comma.

Summary
Overall I would rate this page as extremely poor, the majority of the page is inaccurate and the amount of accurate and reliable data adds up to about two sentence. The writing style is inconsistent between authors and the entire pop culture section needs to be removed.